The Christian alternative

A Christian alternative

Aristides Apology

missing for millenia, Aristides is still glossed by Christian Traditionalists

29 December, 2007


the concept of orthodoxy has a cruel history

Justin Martyr is generally accredited by modern Christianity as writing the first Christian Apologetic, the first defence of the Christian Faith around 150 AD.  Justin was clearly proto-orthodox and anti-Gnostic.  Interestingly 20 years previously there were two Christian apologetics written for the Emperor Hadrian when he visited Athens in 125 AD.  These were praised by both Eusebius and Jerome in their day but nevertheless 'lost' soon after.

The Church's Official historian under Constantine, Eusebius stated:

Aristides also, a man faithfully devoted to the religion we profess, like Quadratus, has left to posterity a defence of the faith, addressed to Hadrian. This work is also preserved by a great number, even to the present day.

Jerome in his lives of Illustrius men writes:

Aristides a most eloquent Athenian philosopher, and a disciple of Christ while yet retaining his philosopher's garb, presented a work to Hadrian at the same time that Quadratus presented his. The work contained a systematic statement of our doctrine, that is, an Apology for the Christians, which is still extant and is regarded by philologians as a monument to his genius.

Again how can such praisable and important documents get 'lost'?

The answer lies in their content.  Fortunately the Apology of Aristides was rediscovered in th 19th Century.

The Second Edition of The New Jerome Biblical Commentary with the Nihil obstat of the Catholic Church summarises Aristides this way:

It (Aristides' Apology) offers philosophical proofs for the existence of God and the nonexistence of pagan gods, argues that Jews misunderstood true worship, gives the basic elements of Christian belief, and closes with an exposition of Christian Moral standards and practices.

However the actual content of the Apology is fascinating.

Aristides negates the Old Testament God by denying the Wrath of God and deprecating the Old Testament mode of Worship.  He attributes the positive Old Testament derived virtues of the Jews to customs they received from their forefathers, but indicates they:

erred from true knowledge (gnosis). And in their imagination they conceive that it is God they serve; whereas by their mode of observance it is to the angels and not to God that their service is rendered...

Like the Gnostics, Aristides does not identify the true God as Creator (demiurge), but rather

The heavens do not limit him, but the heavens and all things, visible and invisible, receive their bounds from him.

Ignorance and forgetfulness are not in his nature, for he is altogether wisdom and understanding; and in Him stands fast all that exists

He requires not aught from any, but all living creatures stand in need of him....

His comments on Christianity:

But the Christians, O King, while they went about and made search, have found the truth; and as we learned from their writings, they have come nearer to truth and genuine knowledge (gnosis) than the rest of the nations....

And verily whatever is spoken in the mouth of the Christians is of God; and their doctrine is the gateway of light.

The Gateway of light is a concept found more frequently in Gnostic texts than in orthodox or proto-orthodox texts

Aristides' Apology goes to the heart of the issue of both the nature of God, the Old Testament, and Gnosis.

Having regard to the emphasised exerpts, I think both Marcion and Valentinus would be very comfortable with Aristides position!

Given the importance placed on Justin Martyr by Christian Traditionalists,  what does it mean to reclaim a different witness that preceded him by decades?




 

A Kingdom Manifesto Copyright 1997 - 2007 © Andrew Moore | Incorporating the Person Paradigm project

moorea@ozemail.com.au